Which condition must be true for a scenario to be considered private during an upgrade?

For a scenario to be considered private during an upgrade, it is essential that a private scenario with the specified name exists. This condition ensures that the scenario is unique and that it is safeguarded from being altered or affected by the upgrade process which might impact shared scenarios or public data. When a private scenario is in place, it signifies that the user intends to maintain confidentiality and exclusivity for the particular scenario, thereby allowing for customized adjustments and individual experimentation without influencing or being influenced by other scenarios in the shared environment.

In scenarios where a shared scenario with the same name exists, it leads to ambiguity and does not support the notion of privacy intended for such upgrades; hence, the scenario cannot be classified as private. Additionally, the absence of any private scenarios does not meet the criteria since a private scenario must be present to validate the conditions surrounding its upgrade. Lastly, the requirement for a global scope does not pertain to the determination of whether a scenario can be designated as private, as private scenarios can also operate within limited scopes.